Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Terrace Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075023003 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,157 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06075023003 covers part of the Silver Terrace area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. 71% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 5% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,206
Renter share17.4%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$118,889

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Silver Terrace
Very Low
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#147 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#147 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7327, -122.3958 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Terrace scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Silver Terrace compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Terrace risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.3This tracttract 0230039.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Silver Terrace. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Terrace

36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 41% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $118,889, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 17% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075023003

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075023003?

Census tract 06075023003 in the Silver Terrace neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075023003?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075023003?

5.1% of residents in tract 06075023003 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,157.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075023003?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 27th, minority 92th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 06075023003 considered part of Silver Terrace?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075023003 fall within Silver Terrace (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075023003 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075023003 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075023003 scores 9.3/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075023003 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 65% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related