Skip to content
Baywood Park, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,580 residents

Baywood Park, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

San Mateo County · Population 1,580

In 2026
Risk score
7.8
HIGH

48th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average4.3 Now7.8
8.9 2.2 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.4 1997 · score 3.4 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.5 2000 · score 3.4 2001 · score 3.5 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.7 2004 · score 3.7 2005 · score 3.7 2006 · score 3.8 2007 · score 3.9 2008 · score 4.6 2009 · score 4.9 2010 · score 5.0 2011 · score 5.1 2012 · score 5.1 2013 · score 5.1 2014 · score 5.1 2015 · score 5.1 2016 · score 5.5 2017 · score 5.6 2018 · score 5.8 2019 · score 6.6 2020 · score 8.9 2021 · score 8.5 2022 · score 8.2 2023 · score 7.9 2024 · score 8.0 2025 · score 7.8 2026 · score 7.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.1 Regional 8.1 State 6.8 Economic 3.7 Supply 1.9 Rent Control 5.6 Eviction 6.6 Tenant 1.9 Housing 4.4 7.8 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +50.3% (2024)
    8.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.1
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    1.9% poverty · 3.5% unemp.
    3.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $3,501 average · 10.3% renters
    1.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.3% of income on rent
    5.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    270 days filing → judgment
    6.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    10.3% renters
    1.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Baywood Park and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Baywood Park compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in San Mateo County
Low
#21 of 33 cities
Rank in county, 38th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 33 cities in San Mateo County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Moderate
#831 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 48th percentileLowHigh
#831 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Baywood Park risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Baywood Park: 7.87.8Baywood ParkThis cityCounty: 8.08.0Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.8
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.8/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 270d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $3,501/mo. A contested eviction takes 270 days and costs $17,049–$33,435 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 10.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,580 residents, 10.3% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8.1 and 8.1 (Dem margin +50.3% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.6, housing court bias 4.4, rent-control risk 5.6. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.7. Supply constraint: 1.9. The numbers behind those: 1.9% poverty, 3.5% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Baywood Park sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Fremont, CA · 254d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 8 Fremont Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Hayward Sunnyvale, CA · 287d · ~$24.9k all-in ($87/day) · score 8 Sunnyvale Santa Clara, CA · 243d · ~$24.8k all-in ($102/day) · score 7.9 Santa Clara Vallejo, CA · 279d · ~$24.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 8.2 Vallejo Concord, CA · 252d · ~$23.8k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Concord Berkeley, CA · 267d · ~$27.9k all-in ($104/day) · score 8.2 Berkeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Baywood Park
Baywood Park · 270d · ~$25.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Baywood Park, CA

Landlording in Baywood Park, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.8/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Baywood Park is a city of 1,580 residents where 10.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $3,501/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Baywood Park eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Baywood Park closes 270 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Baywood Park's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Baywood Park runs $17,049 to $33,435 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 270 days of typical timeline and $3,501/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1.9/10 in Baywood Park, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Baywood Park: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $33,435 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Baywood Park

Trap · 5.6/10
The 4.4/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Baywood Park's rent-control-risk sub-score is 5.6/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Baywood Park if their lease is up?

No, not automatically. California has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. After a tenant has lived in your property for 12 months, you need a specific, legally recognized reason (either "at-fault" like non-payment, or "no-fault" like owner move-in) to terminate their tenancy, even if their lease term has expired. You cannot just refuse to renew a lease without a just cause.

Q2

How much can I raise the rent in Baywood Park?

Baywood Park is subject to California's statewide rent control law (AB 1482). This means you can raise the rent by 5% plus the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), or 10%, whichever is lower, in any 12-month period. There are specific rules for notice periods for rent increases, so always check the current year's CPI and give proper notice.

Q3

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue to avoid paying rent?

This is a common tactic in California. You must address legitimate maintenance issues promptly. If a tenant withholds rent due to an unaddressed issue, they might have a legal defense. Document all communication about repairs, service requests, and your responses. If they claim an issue but don't allow access, document that too. Always try to resolve repair issues quickly to avoid this becoming an eviction defense.

Q4

Do I have to accept Section 8 or other housing vouchers?

Yes. California has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to an applicant simply because they use a Section 8 voucher or other legal source of income to pay rent. You can, however, still apply your standard, non-discriminatory screening criteria to all applicants, including those with vouchers.

Q5

When should I get an attorney involved in an eviction?

The moment you suspect an eviction might be necessary, or certainly after a 3-day notice expires without resolution, you should consult with an attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law. California's eviction process is highly technical, and a single mistake can cost you months and thousands of dollars. An attorney can ensure you follow all procedures correctly and protect your interests.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.8/10 places Baywood Park in the 48th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.