Skip to content
San Carlos, California eviction risk overview
Ranked #359 of 1,865 nationally

San Carlos, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

San Mateo County · Population 29,614

In 2026
Risk score
7.8
HIGH

48th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average4.3 Now7.8
9.0 2.3 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.6 1993 · score 3.6 1994 · score 3.6 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 3.5 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.7 2003 · score 3.7 2004 · score 3.8 2005 · score 3.8 2006 · score 3.8 2007 · score 4.0 2008 · score 4.7 2009 · score 4.9 2010 · score 5.0 2011 · score 5.2 2012 · score 5.2 2013 · score 5.2 2014 · score 5.2 2015 · score 5.2 2016 · score 5.6 2017 · score 5.7 2018 · score 5.8 2019 · score 6.6 2020 · score 9.0 2021 · score 8.6 2022 · score 8.2 2023 · score 8.0 2024 · score 8.1 2025 · score 7.9 2026 · score 7.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 8.1 Regional 8.1 State 6.8 Economic 4.4 Supply 8.3 Rent Control 4.4 Eviction 6.2 Tenant 6.8 Housing 3.4 7.8 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +50.3% (2024)
    8.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    8.1
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    3.2% poverty · 4.6% unemp.
    4.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,854 average · 32.2% renters
    8.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.1% of income on rent
    4.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    260 days filing → judgment
    6.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    32.2% renters
    6.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Carlos and the region

Click any city to see its score

How San Carlos compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in San Mateo County
Low
#26 of 33 cities
Rank in county, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#26 of 33 cities in San Mateo County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Moderate
#941 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 41st percentileLowHigh
#941 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
San Carlos risk score vs. county / state / U.S.San Carlos: 7.87.8San CarlosThis cityCounty: 8.08.0Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.8
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.8/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 260d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,854/mo. A contested eviction takes 260 days and costs $16,801–$34,932 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 32.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 29,614 residents, 32.2% rent. 26% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 3.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 8.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Strong-tenant coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 8.1 and 8.1 (Dem margin +50.3% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.2, housing court bias 3.4, rent-control risk 4.4. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 8.3. The numbers behind those: 3.2% poverty, 4.6% unemployment, 26% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

San Carlos sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Fremont, CA · 254d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 8 Fremont Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Hayward Sunnyvale, CA · 287d · ~$24.9k all-in ($87/day) · score 8 Sunnyvale Santa Clara, CA · 243d · ~$24.8k all-in ($102/day) · score 7.9 Santa Clara Vallejo, CA · 279d · ~$24.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 8.2 Vallejo Concord, CA · 252d · ~$23.8k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Concord Berkeley, CA · 267d · ~$27.9k all-in ($104/day) · score 8.2 Berkeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle San Carlos
San Carlos · 260d · ~$25.9k all-in ($99/day) · score 7.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in San Carlos, CA

Landlording in San Carlos, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.8/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

San Carlos is a city of 29,614 residents where 32.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,854/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How San Carlos eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in San Carlos closes 260 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of San Carlos's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in San Carlos runs $16,801 to $34,932 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 260 days of typical timeline and $2,854/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.8/10 in San Carlos, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in San Carlos: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $34,932 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in San Carlos

Trap · 4.4/10
The 4.9/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. San Carlos's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.4/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the biggest mistake San Carlos landlords make during eviction?

The biggest mistake is trying to handle the eviction process themselves or waiting too long to act. California's laws are too complex, and the costs of delay are too high. Get an attorney involved as soon as the 3-day notice period expires without payment.

Q2

Can I raise the rent significantly in San Carlos?

San Carlos is subject to California's statewide rent control, AB 1482. This generally limits annual rent increases to 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living (CPI), capped at 10% total. You need to understand these rules precisely, as violations can lead to severe penalties. For specifics, refer to our California rent control rules.

Q3

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction order?

Once you have a court order for possession, you must involve the San Mateo County Sheriff's Department for a lockout. You cannot physically remove the tenant yourself. The Sheriff will serve a final notice to vacate, and if the tenant still doesn't leave, they will physically remove them. This is the only legal way to regain possession.

Q4

Is "cash for keys" a legal option in San Carlos?

Yes, "cash for keys" is a completely legal and often smart strategy in California. It's a mutual agreement where you pay a tenant money to vacate the property by a specific date, leaving it in good condition. It avoids the lengthy, costly, and emotionally draining court process. Always put the agreement in writing and have your attorney review it.

Q5

How strict are security deposit rules here?

California's security deposit rules are very strict. The cap is 1.00 month's rent. You must return the deposit or provide an itemized statement of deductions within 21 days of the tenant vacating. Failure to do so can result in the tenant suing you for up to twice the deposit amount in bad faith damages. Document everything, and understand California security deposit rules thoroughly.

Q6

What makes San Carlos's eviction risk moderate at 4.9/10?

While the process difficulty (6.2) and tenant organizing strength (6.8) are high, San Carlos's rent control risk (4.4) and economic stress (4.4) are somewhat lower than other California cities. The biggest factor pushing the overall score down from "high" is that it's not a major city, which often correlates with less aggressive tenant advocacy compared to places like San Francisco or Los Angeles. However, the high supply constraint (8.3) means competition for housing is fierce, which can lead to more desperate tenants trying to stay put.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.8/10 places San Carlos in the 48th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.