Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Palo Alto

Tract 06085511200 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 4,995 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Crescent Park in Palo Alto anchors census tract 06085511200, which lands at 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 33rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

33% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $250,001 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 20% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,712
Renter share30.0%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crescent Park
Moderate
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 16 tracts In Palo Alto
Low
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#342 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#8,405 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palo Alto and the region

Centroid at 37.4512, -122.1470 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palo Alto
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palo Alto
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palo Alto
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palo Alto
3.9

How Crescent Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 511200Palo Alto: 7.87.8Palo Altoparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palo Alto, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085511200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085511200?

Census tract 06085511200 in the Crescent Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085511200?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085511200?

1.8% of residents in tract 06085511200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,995.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085511200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 49th, minority 56th, housing 23th.
Q5

Is tract 06085511200 considered part of Crescent Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085511200 fall within Crescent Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085511200 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085511200 compare to Palo Alto overall?

Tract 06085511200 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Palo Alto at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palo Alto

Top eight tracts in Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related