Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally

Greenway Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089011300 · Shasta, CA · pop 4,955 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Greenway neighborhood of Redding anchors census tract 06089011300, which lands at 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,356 monthly, set against $73,000 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 24% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,972
Renter share44.9%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$73,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Greenway
Moderate
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#16 of 27 tracts In Redding
Moderate
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Moderate
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#3,224 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5667, -122.3356 · click any tract to drill in

Why Greenway scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,356 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Greenway compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Greenway risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.36.3This tracttract 011300Redding: 7.07.0Reddingparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Greenway

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Shasta County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089011300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089011300?

Census tract 06089011300 in the Greenway neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089011300?

Median gross rent is $1,356/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089011300?

12.6% of residents in tract 06089011300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,955.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089011300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 51th, minority 40th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 06089011300 considered part of Greenway?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089011300 fall within Greenway (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06089011300 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06089011300 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089011300 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related