Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1,608 of 84,120 nationally

Kutras Tract Eviction Risk: High , Redding

Tract 06089010100 · Shasta, CA · pop 1,834 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 06089010100 belongs to Kutras Tract in Redding, California. It is home to 1,834 residents and scores 6.4/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 75% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $962 a month against an average household income of $26,471 a year, roughly 44% of income at the averages. Renters make up 77% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 58% Stable renters 19% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units718
Renter share77.2%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate42.6%
Median income$26,471

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Kutras Tract
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 27 tracts In Redding
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Very High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#676 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5838, -122.3909 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kutras Tract scores 8.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
42.6% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$962 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Kutras Tract compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kutras Tract risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.28.2This tracttract 010100Redding: 7.07.0Reddingparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kutras Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kutras Tract

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010100?

Census tract 06089010100 in the Kutras Tract neighborhood scores 8.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089010100?

Median gross rent is $962/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010100?

42.6% of residents in tract 06089010100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,834.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 46th, minority 46th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 06089010100 considered part of Kutras Tract?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010100 fall within Kutras Tract (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06089010100 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06089010100 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010100 scores 8.2/10, higher than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related