Neighborhood · Ranked #2,663 of 84,120 nationally

Kutras Tract Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089010500 · Shasta, CA · pop 5,505 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

How risky is the Kutras Tract area of Redding for landlords? Census tract 06089010500 scores $1/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #20,431 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,221 a month while the average household earns $46,973 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

7.7

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 24% Owners 28%

Tract context

Occupied units1,927

Renter share71.5%

SVI overall0.76

Poverty rate23.5%

Median income$46,973

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5754, -122.3999 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kutras Tract scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Redding

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

3.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

23.5% poverty · this tract

5.9

Supply constraint

$1,221 rent vs county FMR

2.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Redding

6.7

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Redding

8.7

Housing court bias

Inherited from Redding

6.5

How Kutras Tract compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

78%Socioeconomic
62%Household composition
22%Racial/ethnic minority
83%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kutras Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

15.6%Housing insecurity
9.8%Utility-shutoff threat
20.1%Food insecurity
22.5%SNAP enrollment
11.6%Transit barriers
8.6%No health insurance
22.0%Frequent mental distress
36.7%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kutras Tract

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010500

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010500?

Census tract 06089010500 in the Kutras Tract neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06089010500?

Median gross rent is $1,221/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010500?

23.5% of residents in tract 06089010500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,505.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 62th, minority 22th, housing 83th.

Is tract 06089010500 considered part of Kutras Tract?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010500 fall within Kutras Tract (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06089010500 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06089010500 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010500 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.