Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #4,782 of 84,120 nationally

Redding Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06089010702 · Shasta, CA · pop 3,001 · 91% of tract blocks fall in Redding

For landlords sizing up Redding, census tract 06089010702 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,087 a month against an average household income of $74,050 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 33% of occupied homes.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 17% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,299
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate22.6%
Median income$74,050

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 27 tracts In Redding
High
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 50 tracts In Shasta
High
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#2,129 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#4,782 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.6079, -122.4161 · click any tract to drill in

Why Redding scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.6% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,087 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Redding compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Redding risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.07.0This tracttract 010702Redding: 7.07.0Reddingparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Redding

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Shasta County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010702?

Census tract 06089010702 in Redding scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089010702?

Median gross rent is $1,087/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010702?

22.6% of residents in tract 06089010702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,001.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 33th, minority 39th, housing 80th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06089010702 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06089010702 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010702 scores 7/10, right in line with the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related