Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #6,289 of 84,120 nationally

Redding Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06089012301 · Shasta, CA · pop 2,618 · 9% of tract blocks fall in Redding

In Redding, census tract 06089012301 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #50,588 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 25% of renter households, a moderate level, and 1% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,238 monthly, set against $59,469 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 20% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,037
Renter share26.6%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$59,469

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 27 tracts In Redding
Elevated
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#2,572 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#6,289 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.4749, -122.3523 · click any tract to drill in

Why Redding scores 6.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,238 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Redding compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Redding risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.76.7This tracttract 012301Redding: 7.07.0Reddingparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Redding

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Shasta County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089012301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089012301?

Census tract 06089012301 in Redding scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089012301?

Median gross rent is $1,238/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089012301?

14.5% of residents in tract 06089012301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,618.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089012301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 99th, minority 59th, housing 88th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06089012301 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06089012301 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089012301 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related