Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,653 of 84,120 nationally

Kutras Tract Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089010100 · Shasta, CA · pop 1,834 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 06089010100 covers part of the Kutras Tract area of Redding, CA, and scores 7.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,834 residents. 40% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 58% Stable renters 19% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units718
Renter share77.2%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate42.6%
Median income$26,471

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Kutras Tract
Very High
Within parent city
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 27 tracts In Redding
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 50 tracts In Shasta
Very High
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#3,732 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5838, -122.3909 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kutras Tract scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redding
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
42.6% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$962 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redding
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redding
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redding
6.5

How Kutras Tract compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kutras Tract risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.9This tracttract 0101006.5Reddingparent city6.1Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kutras Tract. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kutras Tract

Against Shasta County at 44.1%, roughly three in four of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

The poverty rate is 43%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Set annual rent against average income of $26,471 and the ratio lands at 44%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. SNAP participation runs 35.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. 77% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. At $962 a month, rents run 30% under what the rest of Redding commands.

Against the Shasta County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.8 points. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.7/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

That is riskier than roughly 90% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010100?

Census tract 06089010100 in the Kutras Tract neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06089010100?

Median gross rent is $962/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010100?

42.6% of residents in tract 06089010100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,834.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 46th, minority 46th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 06089010100 considered part of Kutras Tract?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010100 fall within Kutras Tract (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06089010100 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06089010100 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010100 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Redding at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related