Neighborhood · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

Parsons Eviction Risk: Elevated , Redding

Tract 06089010900 · Shasta, CA · pop 4,514 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06089010900 (the Parsons neighborhood of Redding, California) comes in at 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 51% of US census tracts.

39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,136 a month against an average household income of $74,797 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 62% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

6.2

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 38% Owners 38%

Tract context

Occupied units1,603

Renter share61.8%

SVI overall0.94

Poverty rate11.4%

Median income$74,797

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Redding and the region

Centroid at 40.5566, -122.3686 · click any tract to drill in

Why Parsons scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Redding

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

3.3

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

11.4% poverty · this tract

2.9

Supply constraint

$1,136 rent vs county FMR

2.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Redding

6.7

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Redding

8.7

Housing court bias

Inherited from Redding

6.5

How Parsons compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

70%Socioeconomic
97%Household composition
49%Racial/ethnic minority
99%Housing & transportation

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

12.2%Housing insecurity
7.1%Utility-shutoff threat
14.8%Food insecurity
15.0%SNAP enrollment
8.9%Transit barriers
7.4%No health insurance
19.2%Frequent mental distress
35.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Parsons

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redding, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Shasta County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06089010900

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06089010900?

Census tract 06089010900 in the Parsons neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06089010900?

Median gross rent is $1,136/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06089010900?

11.4% of residents in tract 06089010900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,514.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06089010900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 97th, minority 49th, housing 99th.

Is tract 06089010900 considered part of Parsons?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06089010900 fall within Parsons (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06089010900 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06089010900 compare to Redding overall?

Tract 06089010900 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Redding at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redding; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redding

Top eight tracts in Redding ranked by composite eviction-risk score.