Skip to content
Fairfield, California eviction risk overview
Ranked #228 of 1,865 nationally

Fairfield, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Solano County · Population 120,785

In 2026
Risk score
8
HIGH

66th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.5 Now8
9.2 2.5 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.7 1993 · score 3.7 1994 · score 3.7 1995 · score 3.6 1996 · score 3.6 1997 · score 3.6 1998 · score 3.7 1999 · score 3.7 2000 · score 3.7 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.0 2007 · score 4.1 2008 · score 4.9 2009 · score 5.2 2010 · score 5.2 2011 · score 5.4 2012 · score 5.4 2013 · score 5.4 2014 · score 5.4 2015 · score 5.4 2016 · score 5.7 2017 · score 5.8 2018 · score 5.9 2019 · score 6.7 2020 · score 9.2 2021 · score 8.8 2022 · score 8.3 2023 · score 8.0 2024 · score 8.3 2025 · score 8.1 2026 · score 8.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.9 Regional 6.9 State 6.8 Economic 6.1 Supply 8.8 Rent Control 8.5 Eviction 6.3 Tenant 8.1 Housing 6.9 8 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +23.0% (2024)
    6.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.9
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    10.5% poverty · 5.3% unemp.
    6.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,266 average · 38.7% renters
    8.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    39.7% of income on rent
    8.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    246 days filing → judgment
    6.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    38.7% renters
    8.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairfield and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Fairfield compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Solano County
Low
#8 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 30th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 11 cities in Solano County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Elevated
#592 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#592 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Fairfield risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Fairfield: 8.08.0FairfieldThis cityCounty: 8.18.1Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 8
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 8/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 246d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,266/mo. A contested eviction takes 246 days and costs $15,231–$34,090 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 38.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 120,785 residents, 38.7% rent. 40% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.9 and 6.9 (Dem margin +23.0% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.3, housing court bias 6.9, rent-control risk 8.5. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.1. Supply constraint: 8.8. The numbers behind those: 10.5% poverty, 5.3% unemployment, 40% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Fairfield sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Stockton, CA · 246d · ~$23.2k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.2 Stockton Elk Grove, CA · 245d · ~$24.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 7.9 Elk Grove Santa Rosa, CA · 248d · ~$24.2k all-in ($98/day) · score 8 Santa Rosa Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Hayward Vallejo, CA · 279d · ~$24.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 8.2 Vallejo Concord, CA · 252d · ~$23.8k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Concord Berkeley, CA · 267d · ~$27.9k all-in ($104/day) · score 8.2 Berkeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Fairfield
Fairfield · 246d · ~$24.7k all-in ($100/day) · score 8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Fairfield, CA

Landlording in Fairfield, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 8/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Fairfield is a city of 120,785 residents where 38.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 39.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,266/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Fairfield eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Fairfield closes 246 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Fairfield's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Fairfield runs $15,231 to $34,090 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 246 days of typical timeline and $2,266/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.1/10 in Fairfield, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Fairfield: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $34,090 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Fairfield

Trap · 38.7%
38.7% renter share against 120,785 residents produces roughly 46,744 rental occupants in Fairfield. Solano County voted D 30.3% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out for not paying rent in Fairfield?

Even in the fastest, smoothest case, you're looking at a minimum of 30-45 days. This assumes the tenant doesn't respond to the Unlawful Detainer, you get a default judgment, and the sheriff is available immediately for lockout. Realistically, with court backlogs and tenant responses, expect 2-3 months at best for non-payment, and much longer if there are any complications or a contested trial.
Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Fairfield?

No. California has statewide rent control (AB 1482) that limits annual rent increases to 5% plus the local CPI, capped at 10% total. There are some exemptions for newer buildings or owner-occupied duplexes, but generally, you must follow these caps. Always check the current CPI for your area before implementing an increase.
Q3

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is final?

Once the court issues a judgment for possession and the sheriff posts a lockout notice, the tenant legally has to leave. If they don't, the sheriff will physically remove them. You cannot remove them yourself or change the locks before the sheriff's official lockout. Doing so is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in severe penalties against you.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Fairfield?

While you can technically represent yourself in an Unlawful Detainer action, it is highly, highly recommended to hire an attorney in Fairfield and throughout California. The laws are complex, the courts are tenant-friendly, and a single procedural error can derail your entire case, costing you far more in lost rent and repeated legal fees than the initial attorney cost.
Q5

Can I deny an applicant because they use a Section 8 voucher?

No. California has statewide "source of income" protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to an applicant solely because their income comes from a lawful source, such as a Section 8 housing choice voucher. You must treat them like any other applicant, applying your standard screening criteria (credit, background, references) fairly.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 8/10 places Fairfield in the 66th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.