Skip to content
Pittsburg, California eviction risk overview

Pittsburg, CA Eviction Risk: VERY HIGH

Contra Costa County · Population 76,257

In 2026
Risk score
8.5
VERY HIGH

97th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.6 Average4.7 Now8.5
9.6 2.6 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.8 1981 · score 2.8 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.6 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 3.0 1991 · score 3.1 1992 · score 3.8 1993 · score 3.9 1994 · score 3.9 1995 · score 3.8 1996 · score 3.8 1997 · score 3.8 1998 · score 3.8 1999 · score 3.9 2000 · score 3.8 2001 · score 3.9 2002 · score 4.0 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 4.1 2005 · score 4.1 2006 · score 4.2 2007 · score 4.3 2008 · score 5.1 2009 · score 5.3 2010 · score 5.5 2011 · score 5.6 2012 · score 5.6 2013 · score 5.6 2014 · score 5.6 2015 · score 5.6 2016 · score 6.0 2017 · score 6.2 2018 · score 6.3 2019 · score 7.1 2020 · score 9.6 2021 · score 9.2 2022 · score 8.7 2023 · score 8.3 2024 · score 8.7 2025 · score 8.6 2026 · score 8.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.5 Regional 7.5 State 6.8 Economic 6.8 Supply 8.8 Rent Control 8.7 Eviction 6.7 Tenant 8.0 Housing 7.1 8.5 VERY HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +38.0% (2024)
    7.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.5
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    11.0% poverty · 7.5% unemp.
    6.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,264 average · 37.7% renters
    8.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    39.1% of income on rent
    8.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    290 days filing → judgment
    6.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    37.7% renters
    8.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pittsburg and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Pittsburg compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Contra Costa County
Very High
#4 of 50 cities
Rank in county, 94th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 50 cities in Contra Costa County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Very High
#79 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 95th percentileLowHigh
#79 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Pittsburg risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Pittsburg: 8.58.5PittsburgThis cityCounty: 8.18.1Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 8.5
    / 10 · VERY HIGH
    The verdict

    A Very high-tier market.

    Composite 8.5/10. Among the 10% riskiest markets nationally, with heavy tenant exposure, so every notice, hearing, and lease termination needs an attorney in the loop. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 290d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,264/mo. A contested eviction takes 290 days and costs $16,406–$37,220 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 37.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 76,257 residents, 37.7% rent. 39% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.5 and 7.5 (Dem margin +38.0% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.7, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 8.7. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.8. Supply constraint: 8.8. The numbers behind those: 11.0% poverty, 7.5% unemployment, 39% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Pittsburg sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Stockton, CA · 246d · ~$23.2k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.2 Stockton Fremont, CA · 254d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 8 Fremont Elk Grove, CA · 245d · ~$24.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 7.9 Elk Grove Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Hayward Sunnyvale, CA · 287d · ~$24.9k all-in ($87/day) · score 8 Sunnyvale Santa Clara, CA · 243d · ~$24.8k all-in ($102/day) · score 7.9 Santa Clara Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Pittsburg
Pittsburg · 290d · ~$26.8k all-in ($92/day) · score 8.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Pittsburg, CA

Landlording in Pittsburg, California, presents one of the toughest environments for property owners in the nation. The Eviction Risk Score is 8.5/10 (VERY HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Among the toughest 10% of US markets where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Pittsburg is a city of 76,257 residents where 37.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 39.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,264/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Pittsburg eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Pittsburg closes 290 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Pittsburg's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Pittsburg runs $16,406 to $37,220 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 290 days of typical timeline and $2,264/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8/10 in Pittsburg, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Pittsburg: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $37,220 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Pittsburg

Trap · 37.7%
37.7% renter share against 76,257 residents produces roughly 28,718 rental occupants in Pittsburg. Contra Costa County voted D 45.3% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Pittsburg tenant is late on rent for the first time?

Even for a first-time late payment, you should serve the 3-day pay-or-quit notice. It sets a clear expectation and starts the formal process. You can always withdraw it if they pay, but having it ready is crucial. Don't let late payments become a habit.

Q2

Can I raise the rent in Pittsburg?

Yes, but it's subject to California's statewide rent control (AB 1482). This caps annual rent increases at 5% plus the local CPI, or 10%, whichever is lower. You also need to provide proper notice, typically 30 or 60 days depending on the increase amount. Check the current CPI for your area.

Q3

What's the biggest mistake landlords make during eviction in Pittsburg?

The biggest mistake is trying to handle the eviction process without an attorney, or making procedural errors. California law is very tenant-protective. Any misstep, from incorrect notice periods to improper service, can lead to your case being dismissed and you starting from scratch, costing you more time and money. Another big mistake is failing to understand California tenant protections.

Q4

Do I need a "just cause" to evict a tenant in Pittsburg?

Yes, absolutely. California has statewide just-cause eviction requirements. You cannot terminate a tenancy without one of the specific "just causes" outlined in the law, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or owner move-in. No-cause evictions are generally not permitted after a tenant has resided for 12 months.

Q5

How can I avoid evictions altogether in Pittsburg?

While you can't guarantee zero evictions, rigorous tenant screening is your best prevention. Beyond that, maintaining good communication, promptly addressing maintenance issues, and having a clear, legally compliant lease are vital. If issues arise, address them early and consider options like cash-for-keys before a full-blown eviction becomes necessary.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 8.5/10 places Pittsburg in the 97th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.