Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally
Pine Flat Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06107002701 · Tulare, CA · pop 1,396 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Pine Flat
With a score of 7.1/10, tract 06107002701 in Pine Flat, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,396. 8% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Tulare County average of 45.5%.
Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units726
Renter share11.8%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$59,714
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
55
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
44
th percentile
Moderate
National
85
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pine Flat and the region
Centroid at 36.1218, -118.3533 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pine Flat scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pine Flat
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$875 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Flat
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Flat
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Flat
4.7
How Pine Flat compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 72%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 71%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.9%Food insecurity
- 19.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.9%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 38.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pine Flat
Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.1/10. Severe burden reaches 8%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Nationally it ranks #12,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.7/10. Against average income of $59,714, annual rent is just 18%.
It tracks the Tulare County average of 6.9 closely. Average gross rent is $875, close to the Pine Flat average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107002701
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107002701?
Census tract 06107002701 in Pine Flat scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107002701?
Median gross rent is $875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 8% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107002701?
15.6% of residents in tract 06107002701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,396.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107002701?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 32th, minority 36th, housing 71th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107002701 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107002701 compare to Pine Flat overall?
Tract 06107002701 scores 7.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Pine Flat at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Flat; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related