Tulare Eviction Risk: Elevated

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.8/10. Food insecurity runs 29.5% against 17.8% nationally.

Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 7.7/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Housing insecurity runs 24.9% against 14.2% nationally. Cost burden runs 50% here against 45.5% across Tulare County. The voucher gap is 14.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Average gross rent is $1,640, 14% above the Tulare average. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.