Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Upper Land Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , West Sacramento
Tract 06113010313 · Yolo, CA · pop 4,838 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 06113010313 covers part of the Upper Land Park area of West Sacramento, CA, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,838. Cost burden runs 30% here against 46.3% across Yolo County.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 8%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,713
Renter share11.8%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$150,913
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
9
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across West Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5525, -121.5256 · click any tract to drill in
Why Upper Land Park scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from West Sacramento
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,698 rent vs county FMR
7.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from West Sacramento
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from West Sacramento
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from West Sacramento
6.5
How Upper Land Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 5%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Upper Land Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.7%Housing insecurity
- 5.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.1%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 5.4%No health insurance
- 15.2%Frequent mental distress
- 21.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Upper Land Park
Average gross rent is $2,698, 62% above the West Sacramento average. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
The voucher gap is 27.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.2/10. Against the Yolo County average of 6.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.
Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2/10. The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06113010313
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06113010313?
Census tract 06113010313 in the Upper Land Park neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06113010313?
Median gross rent is $2,698/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06113010313?
2.6% of residents in tract 06113010313 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,838.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06113010313?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 29th, minority 65th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 06113010313 considered part of Upper Land Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06113010313 fall within Upper Land Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06113010313 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06113010313 compare to West Sacramento overall?
Tract 06113010313 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of West Sacramento at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from West Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in West Sacramento
Top eight tracts in West Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Old Sacramento
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06113010203
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06113010102
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06113010103
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Old Sacramento
6.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Downtown
6.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Upper Land Park
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Upper Land Park
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related