Skip to content
Lakes East, Connecticut eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,227 residents

Lakes East, CT Eviction Risk: LOW

Fairfield County · Population 1,227

In 2026
Risk score
3.3
LOW

2th percentile, Connecticut.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Lakes East been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min2.7 Average3.2 Now3.3
4.4 2.7
Operator read

Of the 78 cities we track in the county, Lakes East sits #77, closer to the cautious end of its county cohort than the score alone suggests. The 3.3/10 score has ranged only 2.7 to 4.4 across the 50-year reconstruction, so the environment is stable, not just currently favorable. The one number worth watching is economic stress at 1/10, since that is the input with the most room to move.

What do renters in Lakes East earn, and what are they paying?

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Lakes East score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 5.2 State 5.8 Economic 1.0 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 5.9 Tenant 1.0 Housing 4.4 3.3 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +27.2% (2020)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Connecticut legislature & governorship
    5.8
  4. Economic stress
    11.7% poverty · 6.4% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,029 average · 41.7% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.0% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    141 days filing → judgment
    5.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    41.7% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lakes East and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Lakes East sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Fairfield County
Very Low
#77 of 78 cities
Rank in county, 1st percentileLowHigh
#77 of 78 cities in Fairfield County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Connecticut
Very Low
#213 of 214 cities
Rank in state, 1st percentileLowHigh
#213 of 214 cities in Connecticut for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lakes East risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.3Lakes EastThis city5.8Countyavg in county5.7Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Connecticut landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Connecticut statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.3
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 141d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,029/mo. A contested eviction takes 141 days and costs $5,875–$13,737 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 41.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,227 residents, 41.7% rent. 33% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 5.2 (Dem margin +27.2% (2020)). State climate at 5.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.9, housing court bias 4.4, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.9 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 11.7% poverty, 6.4% unemployment, 33% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lakes East sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Bridgeport, CT · 150d · ~$11.5k all-in ($77/day) · score 6.5 Bridgeport Stamford, CT · 146d · ~$11.1k all-in ($76/day) · score 6 Stamford New Haven, CT · 136d · ~$11.1k all-in ($81/day) · score 6.9 New Haven Waterbury, CT · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 5.9 Waterbury Norwalk, CT · 130d · ~$10.1k all-in ($77/day) · score 6.2 Norwalk Danbury, CT · 130d · ~$9.1k all-in ($70/day) · score 6.4 Danbury New Britain, CT · 151d · ~$10.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 6.6 New Britain West Hartford, CT · 150d · ~$11.3k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.6 West Hartford Bristol, CT · 138d · ~$9.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.9 Bristol Meriden, CT · 127d · ~$10.7k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.1 Meriden Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Lakes East
Lakes East · 141d · ~$9.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 3.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lakes East, CT

Landlording in Lakes East, Connecticut, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.3/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lakes East is a city of 1,227 residents where 41.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,029/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lakes East eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lakes East closes 141 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lakes East's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lakes East runs $5,875 to $13,737 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 141 days of typical timeline and $2,029/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Lakes East, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Connecticut, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lakes East: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Connecticut's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $13,737 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lakes East

Trap · C.G.S. 47A + FAIR RENT
The 3.3/10 score weighs nine sub-factors. The most relevant for landlords are court bias, eviction process difficulty, and supply constraint. See the sub-score breakdown above. State-level framework: C.G.S. 47a + Fair Rent.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, county-level. Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 261 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.74× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 3,360 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 20,185.

  • 261Past month
  • 3,360Past 12 months
  • 0.74×vs baseline (past mo)
Notice requirement: at least three days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $175 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the most common mistake Lakes East landlords make during eviction?

The most common mistake is improper notice. Landlords often use the wrong notice period, serve the notice incorrectly, or don't include all the legally required information. Even a small error can get your case dismissed, forcing you to start over.

Q2

Can I refuse to rent to someone in Lakes East because they have a Section 8 voucher?

No. Connecticut has statewide source-of-income protection. You cannot discriminate against an applicant solely because they use a housing voucher or other forms of public assistance to pay rent. You must apply the same screening criteria to all applicants.

Q3

How long does it typically take to get a court date for an eviction in Fairfield County?

After filing, it typically takes a few weeks to a month to get your initial court appearance or mediation date in Fairfield County. This can vary based on court caseloads and whether the tenant requests continuances.

Q4

What if the tenant damages my property during an eviction?

You can pursue the tenant for damages beyond normal wear and tear. Your security deposit is your first line of defense for this. If the damages exceed the deposit, you may need to pursue a separate small claims action against the tenant, which can be time-consuming and may not always result in collection.

Q5

Is rent control a risk in Lakes East?

Our data shows a rent-control-risk sub-score of 5/10 for Lakes East, which is moderate. While there's no statewide rent control in Connecticut, local municipalities could potentially enact it. However, given Lakes East's small size and population, it's a lower immediate risk compared to larger cities, but always something to monitor at the Connecticut rent control rules level.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.3/10 places Lakes East in the 2nd percentile of Connecticut cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.