Census Tract · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Tyndall AFB Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 12005000700 ·
Bay, FL · pop 746 · 62% of tract blocks fall in Tyndall AFB
Census tract 12005000700 runs through Tyndall AFB. With 746 residents, it scores 5.9/10 for landlords. It lands near the 72nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 57% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,955 monthly, set against $61,500 in average yearly household income, roughly 38% of income at the averages. Renters make up 100% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 57%Stable renters 43%Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units28
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate14.0%
Median income$61,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Tyndall AFB
Moderate
Within county
77th percentile
#12 of 49 tracts In Bay
High
Within state
68th percentile
#1,651 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
National
51th percentile
#41,065 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tyndall AFB and the region
Centroid at 30.0486, -85.5532 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tyndall AFB scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tyndall AFB
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
14.0% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,955 rent vs county FMR
7.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tyndall AFB
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tyndall AFB
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tyndall AFB
7.0
How Tyndall AFB compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tyndall AFB, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bay County average of 5.0 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12005000700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12005000700?
Census tract 12005000700 in Tyndall AFB scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12005000700?
Median gross rent is $1,955/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12005000700?
14.0% of residents in tract 12005000700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 746.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12005000700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 27th, minority 38th, housing 8th.
Q5
How does tract 12005000700 compare to Tyndall AFB overall?
Tract 12005000700 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Tyndall AFB at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tyndall AFB; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.