Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

All Bright Shores Eviction Risk: Lower , Lake Magdalene

Tract 12057011107 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 6,363 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 12057011107 sits in the All Bright Shores area of Lake Magdalene, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.3/10. Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 1/10.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 9% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,695
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$93,011

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In All Bright Shores
Moderate
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Lake Magdalene
Very Low
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#227 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Low
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#3,269 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake Magdalene and the region

Centroid at 28.0945, -82.4896 · click any tract to drill in

Why All Bright Shores scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lake Magdalene
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,450 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake Magdalene
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake Magdalene
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake Magdalene
6.7

How All Bright Shores compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
All Bright Shores risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0111074.0Lake Magdaleneparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 379Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 5.89%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.4%Peak (2002)
  • 36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12057011107
Filings dropped 23% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 92Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within All Bright Shores. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in All Bright Shores

25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.

Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 379 filings here across 11 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2002 at 11.4% of renter households.

In a typical year about 5.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent takes 30% or more of income for 53% of renters.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057011107

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057011107?

Census tract 12057011107 in the All Bright Shores neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057011107?

Median gross rent is $1,450/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057011107?

9.5% of residents in tract 12057011107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,363.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057011107?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 30th, minority 54th, housing 44th.
Q5

Is tract 12057011107 considered part of All Bright Shores?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057011107 fall within All Bright Shores (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057011107?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 379 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057011107 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.89% of renter households, peaking at 11.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057011107 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057011107 compare to Lake Magdalene overall?

Tract 12057011107 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Lake Magdalene at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake Magdalene; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lake Magdalene

Top eight tracts in Lake Magdalene ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related