Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Woodside Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Largo

Tract 12103025415 · Pinellas, FL · pop 2,627 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 12103025415 sits in the Woodside Village area of Largo eviction risk, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.7/10. It is home to 2,627 residents. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 10% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,156
Renter share34.7%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$46,169

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Woodside Village
Very Low
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 31 tracts In Largo
Elevated
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#61 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,428 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.9135, -82.7366 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodside Village scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,108 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How Woodside Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodside Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 0254154.0Largoparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 242Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 2.93%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.3%Peak (2001)
  • 11Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12103025415
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 96Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.21×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Woodside Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodside Village

Against Pinellas County at 53.4%, 71% of renters here are cost-burdened. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10.

At $1,108 a month, rents run 32% under what the rest of Largo commands. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10. It sits 0.9 points above the Pinellas County average of 3.8. The filing record is not thin: 242 evictions over 18 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2001 at 7.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 55th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $46,169.

35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025415

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025415?

Census tract 12103025415 in the Woodside Village neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025415?

Median gross rent is $1,108/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025415?

11.5% of residents in tract 12103025415 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,627.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025415?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 59th, minority 36th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025415 considered part of Woodside Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025415 fall within Woodside Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025415?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 242 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025415 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.93% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025415 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.21× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025415 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025415 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related