Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,954 of 84,120 nationally

The Rosery Eviction Risk: Moderate , Largo

Tract 12103025603 · Pinellas, FL · pop 2,561 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 12103025603, home to 2,561 residents in the The Rosery area of Largo, scores 5.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 47% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,018 a month while the average household earns $48,686 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 40% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 13% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,047
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate22.7%
Median income$48,686

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In The Rosery
High
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 31 tracts In Largo
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Very High
Within state
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#698 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.9141, -82.7935 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Rosery scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
22.7% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,018 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How The Rosery compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Rosery risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 025603Largo: 2.42.4Largoparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 929Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 9.24%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.1%Peak (2006)
  • 44Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030256032000: 57 filings (10.16/100 renter HHs)2001: 30 filings (5.35/100 renter HHs)2002: 53 filings (9.45/100 renter HHs)2003: 52 filings (9.27/100 renter HHs)2004: 54 filings (9.62/100 renter HHs)2005: 65 filings (10.50/100 renter HHs)2006: 69 filings (11.14/100 renter HHs)2007: 65 filings (10.50/100 renter HHs)2008: 47 filings (7.59/100 renter HHs)2009: 43 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)2010: 48 filings (9.49/100 renter HHs)2011: 48 filings (8.87/100 renter HHs)2012: 67 filings (12.38/100 renter HHs)2013: 55 filings (10.17/100 renter HHs)2014: 48 filings (8.87/100 renter HHs)2015: 41 filings (7.58/100 renter HHs)2016: 43 filings (9.13/100 renter HHs)2017: 44 filings (9.34/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 23% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 67Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.48×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Rosery. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Rosery

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Largo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 929 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 9.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.1% of renter households in 2006.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.48x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025603

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025603?

Census tract 12103025603 in the The Rosery neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025603?

Median gross rent is $1,018/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025603?

22.7% of residents in tract 12103025603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,561.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025603?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 56th, minority 45th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025603 considered part of The Rosery?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025603 fall within The Rosery (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025603?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 929 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025603 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.24% of renter households, peaking at 11.1% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025603 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.48× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025603 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025603 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related