Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,085 of 84,120 nationally

Hidden Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Pinellas Park

Tract 12103025009 · Pinellas, FL · pop 3,500 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

In Hidden Creek in Pinellas Park, census tract 12103025009 scores 5.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,571 a month against an average household income of $69,273 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 19% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,458
Renter share37.1%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$69,273

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Hidden Creek
Low
Within parent city
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#11 of 14 tracts In Pinellas Park
Low
Within county
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#162 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Moderate
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#2,627 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pinellas Park and the region

Centroid at 27.8773, -82.7410 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hidden Creek scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pinellas Park
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,571 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pinellas Park
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pinellas Park
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pinellas Park
7.3

How Hidden Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hidden Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 025009Pinellas Park: 2.42.4Pinellas Parkparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 928Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.5%Peak (2004)
  • 32Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030250092000: 47 filings (6.39/100 renter HHs)2001: 39 filings (5.31/100 renter HHs)2002: 44 filings (5.99/100 renter HHs)2003: 41 filings (5.58/100 renter HHs)2004: 92 filings (12.52/100 renter HHs)2005: 71 filings (10.16/100 renter HHs)2006: 56 filings (8.01/100 renter HHs)2007: 52 filings (7.44/100 renter HHs)2008: 35 filings (5.01/100 renter HHs)2009: 70 filings (10.01/100 renter HHs)2010: 45 filings (7.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 67 filings (8.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 56 filings (6.68/100 renter HHs)2013: 61 filings (7.28/100 renter HHs)2014: 54 filings (6.44/100 renter HHs)2015: 40 filings (4.77/100 renter HHs)2016: 26 filings (3.77/100 renter HHs)2017: 32 filings (4.64/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 32% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 155Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.88×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (3.64× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hidden Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hidden Creek

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pinellas Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 928 eviction filings here over 18 tracked years, with about 6.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.5% of renter households in 2004.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 66th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025009

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025009?

Census tract 12103025009 in the Hidden Creek neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025009?

Median gross rent is $1,571/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025009?

8.8% of residents in tract 12103025009 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,500.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025009?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 48th, minority 38th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025009 considered part of Hidden Creek?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025009 fall within Hidden Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025009?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 928 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025009 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.94% of renter households, peaking at 12.5% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025009 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.88× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025009 compare to Pinellas Park overall?

Tract 12103025009 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Pinellas Park at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pinellas Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pinellas Park

Top eight tracts in Pinellas Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related