Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #43,441 of 84,120 nationally

Hidden Creek Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pinellas Park

Tract 12103024505 · Pinellas, FL · pop 7,657 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 12103024505 sits in Hidden Creek in Pinellas Park, Florida eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. That is riskier than about 58% of US census tracts.

About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,565 a month against an average household income of $61,313 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 7% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units2,962
Renter share18.9%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$61,313

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Hidden Creek
Very High
Within parent city
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 14 tracts In Pinellas Park
High
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#76 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#1,452 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pinellas Park and the region

Centroid at 27.8753, -82.7183 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hidden Creek scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pinellas Park
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,565 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pinellas Park
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pinellas Park
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pinellas Park
7.3

How Hidden Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hidden Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 024505Pinellas Park: 2.42.4Pinellas Parkparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 677Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 6.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.4%Peak (2004)
  • 41Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030245052000: 27 filings (8.06/100 renter HHs)2001: 33 filings (9.85/100 renter HHs)2002: 42 filings (12.54/100 renter HHs)2003: 31 filings (9.26/100 renter HHs)2004: 55 filings (16.42/100 renter HHs)2005: 49 filings (6.36/100 renter HHs)2006: 54 filings (7.01/100 renter HHs)2007: 30 filings (3.90/100 renter HHs)2008: 36 filings (4.67/100 renter HHs)2009: 38 filings (4.93/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (2.75/100 renter HHs)2011: 24 filings (2.69/100 renter HHs)2012: 32 filings (3.59/100 renter HHs)2013: 27 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2014: 42 filings (4.71/100 renter HHs)2015: 39 filings (4.38/100 renter HHs)2016: 55 filings (9.73/100 renter HHs)2017: 41 filings (7.26/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 52% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 334Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.05×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 16 filings (8.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-06-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2021-07-01: 16 filings (2.91× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-11-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (2.35× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-05-01: 14 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.04× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hidden Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hidden Creek

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pinellas Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.05x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103024505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103024505?

Census tract 12103024505 in the Hidden Creek neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103024505?

Median gross rent is $1,565/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103024505?

15.6% of residents in tract 12103024505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,657.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103024505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 65th, minority 56th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 12103024505 considered part of Hidden Creek?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103024505 fall within Hidden Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103024505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 677 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103024505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.73% of renter households, peaking at 16.4% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103024505 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.05× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103024505 compare to Pinellas Park overall?

Tract 12103024505 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Pinellas Park at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pinellas Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pinellas Park

Top eight tracts in Pinellas Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related