Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Scenic Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Ringgold
Tract 13047030306 · Catoosa County, GA · pop 5,742 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 13047030306 sits in the Scenic Hills area of Ringgold, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. Population here is 5,742. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.1/10.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,916
Renter share16.9%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$84,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
36
th percentile
Low
Within state
36
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ringgold and the region
Centroid at 34.9104, -85.1595 · click any tract to drill in
Why Scenic Hills scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Ringgold
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,138 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ringgold
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ringgold
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ringgold
5.7
How Scenic Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 35%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 18%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Scenic Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.3%Food insecurity
- 9.6%SNAP enrollment
- 7.2%Transit barriers
- 10.6%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 31.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Scenic Hills
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. 15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Average gross rent is $1,138, 19% above the Ringgold average. 43% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Catoosa County average of 38.6%.
Against the Catoosa County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 17% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $84,250, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 0.8 points cooler.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 13047030306
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13047030306?
Census tract 13047030306 in the Scenic Hills neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13047030306?
Median gross rent is $1,138/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13047030306?
5.2% of residents in tract 13047030306 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,742.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13047030306?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 15th, minority 18th, housing 19th.
Q5
Is tract 13047030306 considered part of Scenic Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13047030306 fall within Scenic Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13047030306 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13047030306 compare to Ringgold overall?
Tract 13047030306 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Ringgold at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ringgold; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Ringgold
Top eight tracts in Ringgold ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related