Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally
Ringgold Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13047030305 · Catoosa County, GA · pop 1,950 · 47% of tract blocks fall in Ringgold
Tract 13047030305 sits in Ringgold, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.3/10. It is home to 1,950 residents. 60% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Catoosa County average of 38.6%.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units702
Renter share7.4%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$82,288
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
National
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ringgold and the region
Centroid at 34.8966, -85.1377 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ringgold scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Ringgold
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,309 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ringgold
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ringgold
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ringgold
5.7
How Ringgold compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 29%Socioeconomic
- 25%Household composition
- 5%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.7%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.9%Food insecurity
- 8.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.7%Transit barriers
- 9.4%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 29.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ringgold
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.1/10. Average gross rent is $1,309, 37% above the Ringgold average.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.
SNAP participation runs 8.2% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Catoosa County average of 4.0.
That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 2.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 13047030305
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13047030305?
Census tract 13047030305 in Ringgold scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13047030305?
Median gross rent is $1,309/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13047030305?
2.7% of residents in tract 13047030305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,950.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13047030305?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 25th, minority 5th, housing 14th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 13047030305 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 13047030305 compare to Ringgold overall?
Tract 13047030305 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Ringgold at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ringgold; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Ringgold
Top eight tracts in Ringgold ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related