Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pine Lake

Tract 13089021908 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 5,492 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 13089021908 covers part of the Hunters Glen area of Stone Mountain, GA, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,492. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 26% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,999
Renter share63.1%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$43,795

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Elevated
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Pine Lake
Moderate
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#602 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region

Centroid at 33.7993, -84.1883 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunters Glen scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,200 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.2

How Hunters Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunters Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 0219084.0Pine Lakeparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,480Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 50.57%Avg annual filing rate
  • 54.1%Peak (2011)
  • 425Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089021908
Filings dropped 36% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,656Total filings 2020-21
  • 35.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $43,795, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. SNAP participation runs 28.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 30.7% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,200, 22% below the Stone Mountain average.

Against DeKalb County at 52.2%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5,480 filings here across 8 tracked years.

Filings peaked in 2011 at 54.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 50.6% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021908

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021908?

Census tract 13089021908 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021908?

Median gross rent is $1,200/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021908?

9.9% of residents in tract 13089021908 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,492.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021908?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 84th, minority 93th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021908 considered part of Hunters Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021908 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021908?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,480 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021908 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 50.57% of renter households, peaking at 54.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021908 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021908 compare to Pine Lake overall?

Tract 13089021908 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pine Lake

Top eight tracts in Pine Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related