Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pine Lake

Tract 13089021908 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 5,492 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

The Hunters Glen area of Pine Lake anchors census tract 13089021908, which lands at 6.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #6,668 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

58% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,200 a month against an average household income of $43,795 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 63% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 26% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,999
Renter share63.1%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$43,795

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Pine Lake
Moderate
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#59 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#1,094 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region

Centroid at 33.7993, -84.1883 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunters Glen scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,200 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.2

How Hunters Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunters Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 021908Pine Lake: 2.72.7Pine Lakeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5,480Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 50.57%Avg annual filing rate
  • 54.1%Peak (2011)
  • 425Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890219082004: 663 filings (60.85/100 renter HHs)2007: 743 filings (61.68/100 renter HHs)2011: 789 filings (54.12/100 renter HHs)2012: 783 filings (53.70/100 renter HHs)2013: 788 filings (54.05/100 renter HHs)2014: 675 filings (46.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 614 filings (42.11/100 renter HHs)2016: 425 filings (31.72/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,656Total filings 2020-21
  • 35.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 71 filings (710.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 68 filings (680.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 62 filings (620.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 31 filings (310.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 39 filings (390.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 81 filings (810.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 74 filings (740.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pine Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5,480 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 50.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 54.1% of renter households in 2011.

In CDC survey modeling, about 25.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021908

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021908?

Census tract 13089021908 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021908?

Median gross rent is $1,200/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021908?

9.9% of residents in tract 13089021908 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,492.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021908?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 84th, minority 93th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021908 considered part of Hunters Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021908 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021908?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5,480 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021908 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 50.57% of renter households, peaking at 54.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021908 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021908 compare to Pine Lake overall?

Tract 13089021908 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pine Lake

Top eight tracts in Pine Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related