Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Regal Estates Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lawrenceville

Tract 13135050520 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 7,037 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Regal Estates in Lawrenceville anchors census tract 13135050520, which lands at 6.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 45% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,427 monthly, set against $65,098 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 69% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 38% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units2,240
Renter share69.3%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate21.2%
Median income$65,098

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Regal Estates
Moderate
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 20 tracts In Lawrenceville
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Very High
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#729 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lawrenceville and the region

Centroid at 33.9516, -84.0056 · click any tract to drill in

Why Regal Estates scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lawrenceville
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
21.2% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,427 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lawrenceville
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lawrenceville
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lawrenceville
8.0

How Regal Estates compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Regal Estates risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 050520Lawrenceville: 2.72.7Lawrencevilleparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,806Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 26.17%Avg annual filing rate
  • 39.4%Peak (2004)
  • 190Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 131350505202001: 244 filings (20.87/100 renter HHs)2003: 359 filings (30.71/100 renter HHs)2004: 460 filings (39.35/100 renter HHs)2009: 410 filings (38.83/100 renter HHs)2010: 320 filings (26.04/100 renter HHs)2012: 304 filings (24.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 278 filings (22.13/100 renter HHs)2015: 241 filings (19.19/100 renter HHs)2016: 190 filings (14.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 22% over the past 9 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,067Total filings 2020-21
  • 14.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Regal Estates

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lawrenceville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 21.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13135050520

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050520?

Census tract 13135050520 in the Regal Estates neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13135050520?

Median gross rent is $1,427/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050520?

21.2% of residents in tract 13135050520 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,037.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050520?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 79th, minority 73th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 13135050520 considered part of Regal Estates?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050520 fall within Regal Estates (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13135050520?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,806 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 13135050520 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.17% of renter households, peaking at 39.4% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13135050520 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13135050520 compare to Lawrenceville overall?

Tract 13135050520 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Lawrenceville at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lawrenceville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lawrenceville

Top eight tracts in Lawrenceville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related