Skip to content
Rexburg, Idaho eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,380 of 1,865 nationally

Rexburg, ID Eviction Risk: LOW

Madison County · Population 40,543

In 2026
Risk score
2.5
LOW

97th percentile, Idaho.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.4 Now2.5
3.8 2.1 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.2 1990 · score 2.2 1991 · score 2.3 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.7 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.5 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.5 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.2 2015 · score 2.2 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.5 2018 · score 2.6 2019 · score 2.6 2020 · score 3.6 2021 · score 3.8 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.5 2025 · score 2.5 2026 · score 2.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.6 Regional 2.6 State 1.6 Economic 9.0 Supply 7.7 Rent Control 6.8 Eviction 1.8 Tenant 9.9 Housing 8.1 2.5 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +64.3% (2024)
    2.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.6
  3. State political climate
    Idaho legislature & governorship
    1.6
  4. Economic stress
    35.5% poverty · 8.7% unemp.
    9.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,004 average · 77.1% renters
    7.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    29.9% of income on rent
    6.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    23 days filing → judgment
    1.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    77.1% renters
    9.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    8.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rexburg and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Rexburg compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Madison County
Very High
#1 of 5 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 cities in Madison County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Idaho
Very High
#13 of 236 cities
Rank in state, 95th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 236 cities in Idaho for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Rexburg risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Rexburg: 2.52.5RexburgThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.12.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.5
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 23d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,004/mo. A contested eviction takes 23 days and costs $847–$2,200 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 77.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 40,543 residents, 77.1% rent. 30% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 35.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.6 and 2.6 (GOP margin +64.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.8, housing court bias 8.1, rent-control risk 6.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9. Supply constraint: 7.7. The numbers behind those: 35.5% poverty, 8.7% unemployment, 30% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Rexburg sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Idaho Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 1.9 Idaho Falls Boise City, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 Boise City Meridian, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($77/day) · score 2 Meridian Nampa, ID · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Nampa Caldwell, ID · 23d · ~$1.6k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.3 Caldwell Pocatello, ID · 23d · ~$1.8k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.4 Pocatello Coeur d'Alene, ID · 25d · ~$1.5k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.1 Coeur d'Alene Twin Falls, ID · 23d · ~$1.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 2 Twin Falls Bozeman, MT · 29d · ~$1.7k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.7 Bozeman Logan, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.2 Logan Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Rexburg
Rexburg · 23d · ~$1.5k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Rexburg, ID

Landlording in Rexburg, Idaho, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.5/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Rexburg is a city of 40,543 residents where 77.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 29.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,004/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Rexburg eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Rexburg closes 23 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Rexburg's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 8.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Rexburg runs $847 to $2,200 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 23 days of typical timeline and $1,004/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.9/10 in Rexburg, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Idaho, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Rexburg: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Idaho's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,200 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Rexburg

Trap · 35.5%
Local poverty rate is 35.5%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward moderate volume in Madison County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 6.8/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the majority-renter neighborhoods.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the biggest risk for landlords in Rexburg, ID?

The biggest risk is probably the high sub-scores for housing court bias (8.1) and tenant organizing strength (9.9). While the eviction process itself is rated low difficulty (1.8), these other factors suggest that if a tenant decides to fight an eviction, they may find a sympathetic ear in court or support from local groups. This can drag out the process and increase your costs significantly.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Rexburg without a reason?

Idaho does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement. For month-to-month tenancies, you can typically terminate the lease with a 30-day notice without needing to state a specific reason. However, for fixed-term leases, you generally need a lease violation or other specific cause (like non-payment) to evict before the lease term ends. Always consult your lease and state law.
Q3

How much notice do I need to give a tenant to move out for non-payment?

In Rexburg, for non-payment of rent, you must provide a 3-day "pay-or-quit" notice. This means the tenant has three days to either pay the full amount of overdue rent or move out of the property. If they do neither, you can then proceed with filing an eviction lawsuit.
Q4

Are there rent control laws in Rexburg?

No, there are no rent control laws in Rexburg or anywhere in Idaho. Idaho has a statewide ban on rent control, as detailed in our Idaho rent control rules guide. This means you are generally free to set your rental prices based on market conditions.
Q5

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is granted?

If the court grants you an eviction and issues a Writ of Restitution, and the tenant still refuses to leave, you must involve the local sheriff's department. The sheriff will serve the writ and, if necessary, physically remove the tenant from the property. You cannot do this yourself.
Q6

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Rexburg?

While you can technically represent yourself in an eviction case (pro se), it's highly recommended to consult with or hire an attorney, especially if it's your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting the eviction. An attorney can ensure all notices are properly served, filings are correct, and represent you effectively in court, saving you time and money in the long run.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.5/10 places Rexburg in the 97th percentile of Idaho cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.