Chatham Fields Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031440201 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,096 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 17031440201 covers part of the Chatham Fields area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,096 residents. SNAP participation runs 41.0% against 15.2% nationally.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7482, -87.6101 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chatham Fields scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Chatham Fields compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 70%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 98%Grade B
- 2%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 2,132Total filings over 15 yrs
- 7.92%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.3%Peak (2001)
- 159Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chatham Fields. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.5%Housing insecurity
- 21.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 38.1%Food insecurity
- 41.0%SNAP enrollment
- 17.9%Transit barriers
- 10.9%No health insurance
- 18.7%Frequent mental distress
- 35.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Chatham Fields
Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.1/10.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. The poverty rate is 32%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. This is renter territory: 74% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $38,257, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. At $1,068 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Chicago commands.
Against Cook County at 45.6%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 8.1/10.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 21.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Court records carry 2,132 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
The worst year on record was 2001, when 11.3% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 7.9% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031440201
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031440201?
What is the average rent in tract 17031440201?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031440201?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031440201?
Is tract 17031440201 considered part of Chatham Fields?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031440201?
What share of households in tract 17031440201 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031440201 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031440201 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.