Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally
Chatham Fields Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031440202 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,763 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
How risky is the Chatham Fields neighborhood of Chicago for landlords? Census tract 17031440202 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 81% of US census tracts.
60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $950 a month against an average household income of $35,079 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 67% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,618
Renter share66.8%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate20.3%
Median income$35,079
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
84
th percentile
High
Within state
93
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7410, -87.6098 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chatham Fields scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
20.3% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$950 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Chatham Fields compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 85
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 81%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 966Total filings over 15 yrs
- 4.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.2%Peak (2003)
- 54Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 24% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Chatham Fields. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.3%Housing insecurity
- 14.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 25.6%Food insecurity
- 25.9%SNAP enrollment
- 12.1%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 32.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chatham Fields
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chicago eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Cook County average of 5.7 and above the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 966 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 4.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.2% of renter households in 2003.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 85th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031440202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031440202?
Census tract 17031440202 in the Chatham Fields neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031440202?
Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031440202?
20.3% of residents in tract 17031440202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,763.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031440202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 85th, minority 99th, housing 46th.
Q5
Is tract 17031440202 considered part of Chatham Fields?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031440202 fall within Chatham Fields (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031440202?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 966 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031440202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.84% of renter households, peaking at 7.2% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031440202 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031440202 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031440202 scores 6.4/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 5.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031440202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Altgeld Gardens
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Ridgeland
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Philip Murray Homes
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Becks Park
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Pacific Junction
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
North Kenwood
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Homan Square
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Ridgeland
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Related