Cheltenham Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031460400 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,682 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 17031460400 covers part of the Cheltenham area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,682 residents. 45% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7445, -87.5637 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cheltenham scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cheltenham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 75%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 43%Grade C
- 50%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 924Total filings over 15 yrs
- 9.56%Avg annual filing rate
- 12.5%Peak (2001)
- 80Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cheltenham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.2%Housing insecurity
- 17.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 31.6%Food insecurity
- 32.6%SNAP enrollment
- 15.1%Transit barriers
- 9.4%No health insurance
- 17.2%Frequent mental distress
- 32.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cheltenham
Against Cook County at 45.6%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.3/10. It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1.
SNAP participation runs 32.6% against 15.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,106, 23% below the Chicago average.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 924 filings here across 15 tracked years.
Filings peaked in 2001 at 12.5% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 9.6% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031460400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031460400?
What is the average rent in tract 17031460400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031460400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031460400?
Is tract 17031460400 considered part of Cheltenham?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031460400?
What share of households in tract 17031460400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031460400 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031460400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.