Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Irondale Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago

Tract 17031510100 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,639 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

17031510100 is a census tract in the Irondale area of Chicago, IL. It scores 7.6/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,639 residents. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 20% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,259
Renter share40.3%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate18.7%
Median income$71,276

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Irondale
Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#346 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#380 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#402 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.7126, -87.5501 · click any tract to drill in

Why Irondale scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
18.7% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,210 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Irondale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Irondale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.67.6This tracttract 510100Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 160Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 3.08%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.7%Peak (2014)
  • 11Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170315101002001: 13 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (2.19/100 renter HHs)2003: 8 filings (1.95/100 renter HHs)2004: 13 filings (3.16/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (3.01/100 renter HHs)2006: 7 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2007: 10 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2008: 13 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2009: 9 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (3.62/100 renter HHs)2011: 9 filings (2.37/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (1.84/100 renter HHs)2014: 18 filings (4.74/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (2.89/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 15% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Irondale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Irondale

What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8.5/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.9/10.

Adults with no health insurance runs 25.5% against 11.3% nationally. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. At $1,210 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Chicago commands.

The filing record is not thin: 160 evictions over 15 years of observation. SNAP participation runs 23.1% against 15.2% nationally. Against Cook County at 45.6%, roughly one in two of renters here are cost-burdened.

The worst year on record was 2014, when 4.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.1% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.5 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031510100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031510100?

Census tract 17031510100 in the Irondale neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031510100?

Median gross rent is $1,210/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031510100?

18.7% of residents in tract 17031510100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,639.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031510100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 85th, minority 91th, housing 73th.
Q5

Is tract 17031510100 considered part of Irondale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031510100 fall within Irondale (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031510100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 160 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031510100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.08% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031510100 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031510100 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031510100 scores 7.6/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031510100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 21% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related