Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally

Irondale Eviction Risk: High , Chicago

Tract 17031520200 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,652 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

With a score of 8.1/10, tract 17031520200 in the Irondale area of Chicago, IL reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,652 residents. Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 28% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,113
Renter share52.7%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate30.2%
Median income$46,803

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Irondale
Very High
Within parent city
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#222 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#150 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.7123, -87.5407 · click any tract to drill in

Why Irondale scores 8.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
30.2% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$1,036 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Irondale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Irondale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.18.1This tracttract 520200Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 307Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 3.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.3%Peak (2007)
  • 23Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170315202002001: 16 filings (2.41/100 renter HHs)2002: 22 filings (3.31/100 renter HHs)2003: 24 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)2004: 16 filings (2.41/100 renter HHs)2005: 19 filings (3.49/100 renter HHs)2006: 11 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)2007: 29 filings (5.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 24 filings (4.40/100 renter HHs)2009: 18 filings (3.30/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (2.81/100 renter HHs)2011: 24 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2012: 16 filings (2.50/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (3.59/100 renter HHs)2015: 23 filings (3.59/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 44% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Irondale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Irondale

Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10.

The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $1,036, 28% below the Chicago average. Housing insecurity runs 28.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The filing record is not thin: 307 evictions over 15 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

The worst year on record was 2007, when 5.3% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.4% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031520200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031520200?

Census tract 17031520200 in the Irondale neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031520200?

Median gross rent is $1,036/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031520200?

30.2% of residents in tract 17031520200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,652.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031520200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 77th, minority 91th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 17031520200 considered part of Irondale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031520200 fall within Irondale (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031520200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 307 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031520200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.35% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031520200 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031520200 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031520200 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031520200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 49% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related