Plum Grove Village Eviction Risk: Lower

The clearest offset is economic stress, at 1.4/10. The severe-burden share is 24%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

The 2 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 3.2 to 4.6, a 1.4-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address. Filings are well documented here: 461 across 2 observed tracts.

SNAP participation is 6.1% of households versus 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity affects 8.6% of adults, 9.2 points below the national rate.

The worst year on record was 2011, when filings touched 9.6% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 4.3% in 2015, is well off that peak. Among the 6 mapped neighborhoods of Palatine, it ranks #7 by risk, the lower third.

Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. For a like-for-like read, Winston Park and Baldwin score within a fraction of it. Against average income of $131,524, annual rent is only 14%, a wide affordability cushion.

Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent runs $1,566, close to the Palatine average.

For a specific building, read the per-tract breakdown below rather than the 3.8 headline, because the internal range is too wide to average safely. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.