Skip to content
Protection, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 492 residents

Protection, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Comanche County · Population 492

In 2026
Risk score
1.8
VERY LOW

17th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.6 Now1.8
2.7 1.3 1976 · score 1.6 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.8 1983 · score 1.7 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.3 1986 · score 1.3 1987 · score 1.3 1988 · score 1.3 1989 · score 1.3 1990 · score 1.3 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.6 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.7 1995 · score 1.7 1996 · score 1.6 1997 · score 1.5 1998 · score 1.5 1999 · score 1.4 2000 · score 1.4 2001 · score 1.5 2002 · score 1.5 2003 · score 1.5 2004 · score 1.5 2005 · score 1.5 2006 · score 1.5 2007 · score 1.5 2008 · score 1.7 2009 · score 1.8 2010 · score 1.9 2011 · score 1.9 2012 · score 1.7 2013 · score 1.7 2014 · score 1.6 2015 · score 1.5 2016 · score 1.6 2017 · score 1.6 2018 · score 1.6 2019 · score 1.6 2020 · score 2.5 2021 · score 2.7 2022 · score 1.9 2023 · score 1.9 2024 · score 1.8 2025 · score 1.8 2026 · score 1.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.4 Regional 2.4 State 2.0 Economic 3.9 Supply 3.1 Rent Control 2.4 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 5.1 Housing 3.6 1.8 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +68.3% (2024)
    2.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.4
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    9.1% poverty · 0.4% unemp.
    3.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $521 average · 22.8% renters
    3.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    19.1% of income on rent
    2.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    35 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    22.8% renters
    5.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Protection and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Protection compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Comanche County
Very Low
#3 of 3 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 cities in Comanche County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Very Low
#665 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 10th percentileLowHigh
#665 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Protection risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Protection: 1.81.8ProtectionThis cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.8
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 35d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $521/mo. A contested eviction takes 35 days and costs $1,322–$3,886 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 22.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 492 residents, 22.8% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.4 and 2.4 (GOP margin +68.3% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 3.6, rent-control risk 2.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.9. Supply constraint: 3.1. The numbers behind those: 9.1% poverty, 0.4% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Protection sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Enid, OK · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.2 Enid Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Protection
Protection · 35d · ~$2.6k all-in ($74/day) · score 1.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Protection, KS

Landlording in Protection, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.8/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Protection is a city of 492 residents where 22.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 19.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $521/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Protection eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Protection closes 35 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Protection's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Protection runs $1,322 to $3,886 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 35 days of typical timeline and $521/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.1/10 in Protection, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Protection: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,886 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Protection

Trap · 2.4/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Protection's 2.8/10 is below the Kansas state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 2.4/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Protection, KS without a reason?

Yes, for month-to-month tenancies, you can terminate the lease without cause by providing a 30-day notice. For fixed-term leases, you generally need a lease violation or for the lease term to expire. Kansas does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements, which gives landlords more flexibility.

Q2

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give them a 3-day notice?

Accepting a partial payment after issuing a 3-day pay-or-quit notice usually "waives" the notice, meaning you have to start the eviction process over. It's generally best to accept either the full amount or none at all if you intend to proceed with eviction. Consult an attorney if you're unsure, as this can be a common landlord mistake.

Q3

How long does it take to get a court date for an eviction in Protection?

After you file your petition with the Comanche County District Court, a hearing is typically scheduled within 1-3 weeks. The entire process, from notice to lockout, averages about 35 days in Kansas.

Q4

Can I change the locks myself if my tenant doesn't move out after the notice period?

Absolutely not. This is illegal self-help eviction. You must go through the court process and obtain a writ of restitution. Only the sheriff can legally remove a tenant and their belongings. Changing locks yourself can lead to severe penalties and legal liability for you as the landlord.

Q5

Is rent control an issue in Protection, KS?

No, Kansas has a statewide preemption against rent control, meaning no city or county in Kansas, including Protection, can enact rent control measures. Our rent-control-risk sub-score for Protection is very low at 2.4/10, so you don't need to worry about this.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.8/10 places Protection in the 17th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.