Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,699 of 84,120 nationally

Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission

Tract 20091050301 · Johnson County, KS · pop 3,625 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

The Countryside area of Mission is where census tract 20091050301 sits, home to 3,625 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. On the national scale it ranks #51,316 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,148 monthly, set against $58,361 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 82% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 52% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units2,299
Renter share81.6%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate19.4%
Median income$58,361

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 5 tracts In Countryside
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 3 tracts In Mission
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileBottomTop
#10 of 154 tracts In Johnson County
Very High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileBottomTop
#61 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission and the region

Centroid at 39.0337, -94.6638 · click any tract to drill in

Why Countryside scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
19.4% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,148 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.6

How Countryside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Countryside risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 050301Mission: 3.53.5Missionparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Countryside

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mission eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Johnson County average of 3.9 and above the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 20091050301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050301?

Census tract 20091050301 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20091050301?

Median gross rent is $1,148/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050301?

19.4% of residents in tract 20091050301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,625.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 4th, minority 42th, housing 47th.

Q5

Is tract 20091050301 considered part of Countryside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050301 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).

Q6

What share of households in tract 20091050301 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 20091050301 compare to Mission overall?

Tract 20091050301 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Mission at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q8

Was tract 20091050301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mission

Top eight tracts in Mission ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related