Neighborhood · Ranked #53,699 of 84,120 nationally

Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission

Tract 20091050302 · Johnson County, KS · pop 1,887 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 4.9/10 for census tract 20091050302 reflects conditions in the Countryside area of Mission, Kansas. On the national scale it ranks #54,336 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,145 a month against an average household income of $74,583 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

3.8

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 29% Owners 48%

Tract context

Occupied units1,155

Renter share52.3%

SVI overall0.53

Poverty rate9.1%

Median income$74,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission and the region

Centroid at 39.0196, -94.6549 · click any tract to drill in

Why Countryside scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Mission

6.9

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.4

State political climate

Kansas legislature & governorship

2.0

Economic stress

9.1% poverty · this tract

2.3

Supply constraint

$1,145 rent vs county FMR

3.5

Rent control risk

Inherited from Mission

3.8

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.3

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Mission

9.4

Housing court bias

Inherited from Mission

4.6

How Countryside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

30%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
39%Racial/ethnic minority
80%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
20%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

9.6%Housing insecurity
7.5%Utility-shutoff threat
10.9%Food insecurity
6.6%SNAP enrollment
6.5%Transit barriers
8.8%No health insurance
14.3%Frequent mental distress
34.5%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Countryside

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mission eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Johnson County average of 3.9 and above the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 20091050302

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050302?

Census tract 20091050302 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 20091050302?

Median gross rent is $1,145/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050302?

9.1% of residents in tract 20091050302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,887.

How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 59th, minority 39th, housing 80th.

Is tract 20091050302 considered part of Countryside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050302 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 20091050302 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 20091050302 compare to Mission overall?

Tract 20091050302 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Mission at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 20091050302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mission

Top eight tracts in Mission ranked by composite eviction-risk score.