Skip to content
Greenwich, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 62 residents

Greenwich, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Sedgwick County · Population 62

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

56th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average1.9 Now2.1
3.0 1.5 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.9 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 1.9 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.6 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.7 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.6 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.6 2008 · score 1.9 2009 · score 2.1 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.1 2012 · score 2.0 2013 · score 1.9 2014 · score 1.8 2015 · score 1.8 2016 · score 1.8 2017 · score 1.8 2018 · score 1.9 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.8 2021 · score 3.0 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.9 Regional 4.9 State 2.0 Economic 4.8 Supply 7.4 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.9 Tenant 7.4 Housing 2.1 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +13.8% (2024)
    4.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.9
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    25.0% poverty · 5.4% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,018 average · 50.0% renters
    7.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.3% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    40 days filing → judgment
    1.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    50.0% renters
    7.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Greenwich and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Greenwich compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Sedgwick County
Low
#18 of 23 cities
Rank in county, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#18 of 23 cities in Sedgwick County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Moderate
#355 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#355 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Greenwich risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Greenwich: 2.12.1GreenwichThis cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 40d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,018/mo. A contested eviction takes 40 days and costs $1,094–$3,741 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 50.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 62 residents, 50.0% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 25.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.9 and 4.9 (GOP margin +13.8% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.9, housing court bias 2.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 7.4. The numbers behind those: 25.0% poverty, 5.4% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Greenwich sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Tulsa, OK · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Tulsa Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Greenwich
Greenwich · 40d · ~$2.4k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Greenwich, KS

Landlording in Greenwich, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Greenwich is a city of 62 residents where 50.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,018/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Greenwich eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Greenwich closes 40 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Greenwich's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Greenwich runs $1,094 to $3,741 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 40 days of typical timeline and $1,018/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.4/10 in Greenwich, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Greenwich: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,741 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Greenwich

Trap · R+12.6
Greenwich reflects the demographic and political composition of Sedgwick County, with eviction procedure governed at the state level. Sedgwick County 2020 margin: R+12.6.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just stops paying and vanishes?

If a tenant disappears and you suspect abandonment, you need to follow specific legal procedures before re-taking possession. Don't just change the locks. K.S.A. § 58-2565 outlines the process, usually involving sending a notice to their last known address and waiting a set period. If you re-take possession improperly, the tenant could sue you.
Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Greenwich?

Kansas has no statewide rent control, meaning you can generally raise the rent. However, you must provide proper notice, typically 30 days, before the next rent period begins. This must be a written notice. You can't raise rent mid-lease unless the lease specifically allows for it (which is rare and often not advisable).
Q3

What are common mistakes landlords make during eviction?

The biggest mistakes are self-help evictions (changing locks, turning off utilities), not giving proper notice, or incorrectly serving legal documents. These errors can get your case dismissed, costing you time and money, and potentially opening you up to lawsuits from the tenant. Always follow the law, even if it feels slow.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction?

While not legally required for every step, hiring a lawyer for an eviction in Kansas is highly recommended, especially once the notice period expires and you need to file in court. An attorney ensures proper procedure, saving you from costly mistakes and delays. For more context, see our Sedgwick County eviction guide.
Q5

What if my tenant claims I retaliated against them?

Kansas law prohibits retaliatory evictions. If you try to evict a tenant shortly after they complain about a habitability issue or exercise other tenant rights, they could claim retaliation. Ensure your eviction is based on a clear, documented lease violation, not a reaction to a tenant complaint. Document everything.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places Greenwich in the 56th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.