1 census tracts · pop 4,770 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.4/10
· range 5.4–5.4
Landon Village maps to a single census tract in Bethesda, MD and houses 4,770 people. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.4/10, in the Moderate tier. Against a Bethesda baseline of 28.7%, 13% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.
The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 51.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.
Average gross rent is $3,501, 42% above the Bethesda average of $2,469. Well under the midpoint is economic stress, at 1/10.
CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 4.3% of adults, against 14.2% nationally. Disability prevalence reaches 17.0% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute. Running hot is tenant-organizing strength at 7.4/10.
That places it #11 of 17 neighborhoods in Bethesda. At 19% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out. For a like-for-like read, Maplewood and Sumner score within a fraction of it.
Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is only 17%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 5.4/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Landon Village vs BethesdaHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority52%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport2%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Landon Village
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
4.3%Housing insecurity
2.6%Utility shutoff threat
4.5%Food insecurity
2.3%SNAP enrollment
3.6%No health insurance
17.0%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Landon Village
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Landon Village?
Landon Village scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Landon Village compare to Bethesda overall?
Landon Village scores 0.9 points lower than Bethesda overall (6.3/10). Renters spend 13% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $3,501 vs $2,469.
Q3
What is the average rent in Landon Village?
Average gross rent in Landon Village is $3,501/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Landon Village residents are renters?
19% of Landon Village households are renter-occupied (vs 36% in Bethesda). The neighborhood has 4,770 residents.
Q5
Is Landon Village a high social-vulnerability area?
Landon Village sits in the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Landon Village for landlords?
Landon Village carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.4/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Bethesda as a whole (6.3/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Landon Village?
Landon Village has 4,756 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (64.1%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (23.9%), Hispanic / Latino (5.6%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.