Skip to content
Peabody, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
Ranked #467 of 1,865 nationally

Peabody, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Essex County · Population 54,695

In 2026
Risk score
6.4
ELEVATED

77th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average3.6 Now6.4
10 5 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.3 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 3.2 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.3 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.5 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.5 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.0 2010 · score 4.1 2011 · score 4.2 2012 · score 4.1 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.8 2017 · score 5.0 2018 · score 5.3 2019 · score 5.5 2020 · score 6.4 2021 · score 6.4 2022 · score 6.4 2023 · score 6.5 2024 · score 6.2 2025 · score 6.8 2026 · score 6.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.8 Regional 6.8 State 6.2 Economic 5.1 Supply 8.2 Rent Control 8.5 Eviction 5.8 Tenant 7.3 Housing 6.1 6.4 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +20.3% (2024)
    6.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.8
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    6.5% poverty · 4.8% unemp.
    5.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,950 average · 34.4% renters
    8.2
  6. Rent Control risk
    35.9% of income on rent
    8.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    184 days filing → judgment
    5.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    34.4% renters
    7.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Peabody and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Peabody compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Essex County
Elevated
#8 of 24 cities
Rank in county, 70th percentileBottomTop
#8 of 24 cities in Essex County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
Elevated
#63 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 75th percentileBottomTop
#63 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Peabody risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Peabody: 6.46.4PeabodyThis cityCounty: 6.46.4Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.4
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 184d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,950/mo. A contested eviction takes 184 days and costs $10,215-$31,387 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 34.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 54,695 residents, 34.4% rent. 36% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.8 and 6.8 (Dem margin +20.3% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.8, housing court bias 6.1, rent-control risk 8.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.1. Supply constraint: 8.2. The numbers behind those: 6.5% poverty, 4.8% unemployment, 36% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Peabody sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.9 Worcester Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 5.8 Cambridge Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.8 Lowell Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.1 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.6 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6.6 Lynn Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 4.4 Newton Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Lawrence Somerville, MA · 190d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 4.6 Somerville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Peabody
Peabody · 184d · ~$20.8k all-in ($113/day) · score 6.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Peabody, MA

Landlording in Peabody, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.4/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Peabody is a city of 54,695 residents where 34.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 35.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,950/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Peabody eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Peabody closes 184 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Peabody's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Peabody runs $10,215 to $31,387 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 184 days of typical timeline and $1,950/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.3/10 in Peabody, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Peabody: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $31,387 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Peabody

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Peabody to neighboring cities in Essex County via the grid below. The 6.8/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under MGL 239 + Housing Court. Essex County 2020 presidential margin: D+29.1. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Massachusetts statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out for not paying rent in Peabody?

Even with a perfect process, it's rare to get a tenant out in less than 60-90 days, and our data shows an average of 184 days. The 14-day notice is just the start. Court filings, hearings, and sheriff scheduling all add significant time. Your best bet for speed is "cash for keys" if the tenant agrees.
Q2

Can I just change the locks if my tenant stops paying?

Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings are illegal "self-help" evictions in Massachusetts. You will face severe penalties, including fines and potentially owing the tenant triple damages. Always follow the legal process through the courts.
Q3

Do I really need a lawyer for an eviction in Peabody?

Yes, especially in Peabody. Massachusetts landlord-tenant law is highly complex and favors tenants. An experienced attorney will ensure your notices are correct, court filings are timely, and you navigate the Housing Court system effectively. Trying to save a few thousand dollars on legal fees can easily cost you tens of thousands in lost rent and penalties.
Q4

What if my tenant claims a hardship and can't pay?

Massachusetts courts are sensitive to tenant hardships. While a tenant's inability to pay doesn't automatically stop an eviction, judges may grant continuances or encourage mediation. Be prepared to show you've offered reasonable payment plans or explored other solutions before resorting to eviction. Document all your efforts.
Q5

Is rent control a real risk in Peabody?

While there's no statewide rent control in Massachusetts currently, the rent-control-risk sub-score for Peabody is 8.5. This indicates a high potential for local ordinances to be enacted in the future, given the economic stress and tenant organizing strength. Stay informed about local politics and proposals. See our Massachusetts rent control rules for more.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.4/10 places Peabody in the 77th percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.