Skip to content
Lowell, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
Ranked #349 of 1,865 nationally

Lowell, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Middlesex County · Population 118,368

In 2026
Risk score
6.8
ELEVATED

93th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average3.7 Now6.8
10 5 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.6 1997 · score 3.6 1998 · score 3.7 1999 · score 3.7 2000 · score 3.4 2001 · score 3.5 2002 · score 3.6 2003 · score 3.6 2004 · score 3.6 2005 · score 3.7 2006 · score 3.8 2007 · score 3.8 2008 · score 4.0 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.2 2011 · score 4.3 2012 · score 4.2 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.3 2015 · score 4.4 2016 · score 4.8 2017 · score 5.0 2018 · score 5.2 2019 · score 5.4 2020 · score 6.2 2021 · score 6.2 2022 · score 6.2 2023 · score 6.2 2024 · score 6.0 2025 · score 6.7 2026 · score 6.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.5 Regional 7.0 State 8.0 Economic 7.5 Supply 6.5 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 6.5 Tenant 6.0 Housing 6.5 6.8 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +39.5% (2024)
    6.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.0
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    8.0
  4. Economic stress
    16.0% poverty · 5.4% unemp.
    7.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,625 average · 56.8% renters
    6.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.1% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    198 days filing → judgment
    6.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    56.8% renters
    6.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lowell and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Lowell compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Middlesex County
Very High
#3 of 35 cities
Rank in county, 94th percentileBottomTop
#3 of 35 cities in Middlesex County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
Very High
#23 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileBottomTop
#23 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lowell risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Lowell: 6.86.8LowellThis cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.8
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 198d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,625/mo. A contested eviction takes 198 days and costs $13,089-$26,725 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 56.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 118,368 residents, 56.8% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 16.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.5 and 7 (Dem margin +39.5% (2024)). State climate at 8, a tenant-leaning legislature.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.5, housing court bias 6.5, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.5. Supply constraint: 6.5. The numbers behind those: 16.0% poverty, 5.4% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lowell sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.9 Worcester Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 5.8 Cambridge Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.1 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.6 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6.6 Lynn Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 4.4 Newton Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Lawrence Somerville, MA · 190d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 4.6 Somerville Framingham, MA · 189d · ~$20.6k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Framingham Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Lowell
Lowell · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lowell, MA

Landlording in Lowell, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.8/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lowell is a city of 118,368 residents where 56.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,625/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lowell eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lowell closes 198 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lowell's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lowell runs $13,089 to $26,725 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 198 days of typical timeline and $1,625/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6/10 in Lowell, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lowell: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $26,725 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lowell

Trap · 6.8/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Lowell's 5.9/10 is near the Massachusetts state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 6.8/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the most common mistake landlords make in Lowell evictions?

The most common mistake is failing to follow the precise notice requirements and timelines. Massachusetts law is very specific. Missing a deadline, using the wrong form, or improper service of notice can lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to restart the entire process, costing you more time and money.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Lowell for reasons other than non-payment?

Yes, you can. If you have a lease agreement, you can evict for lease violations (e.g., unauthorized pets, property damage). For month-to-month tenancies (tenancies-at-will), you can terminate the tenancy for "no cause" by giving proper 30-day notice. However, you cannot evict for discriminatory reasons or in retaliation for a tenant exercising their rights.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Lowell?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly advisable to hire an attorney specializing in landlord-tenant law for an eviction in Lowell. The process is complex, and the courts can be unforgiving of procedural errors. Given the high costs and long timelines involved, a lawyer can save you significant money and stress in the long run by ensuring the process is handled correctly the first time.

Q4

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to a job loss or other hardship?

Compassion is fine, but business is business. While you can offer payment plans or other accommodations, you are not legally obligated to do so. If you choose to offer an arrangement, get it in writing. If they still can't pay, proceed with the eviction notice as planned. Remember, Massachusetts has source-of-income protection, but that doesn't excuse a tenant from paying their agreed-upon rent.

Q5

How can I avoid eviction entirely in Lowell?

The best way to avoid eviction is through rigorous tenant screening upfront, a clear and legally compliant lease agreement, and proactive communication. Address issues early, before they escalate. If a tenant is struggling, try to work with them on a solution, but always have your legal options ready. Sometimes, a well-placed "cash for keys" offer can prevent a full-blown eviction.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.8/10 places Lowell in the 93rd percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.