Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Ferndale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26125173200 · Oakland County, MI · pop 2,864

26125173200 is a census tract in Ferndale, MI. It scores 3.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,864. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 19% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,429
Renter share28.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$120,144

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Ferndale
Very Low
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#224 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Low
Within state
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#2,024 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ferndale and the region

Centroid at 42.4639, -83.1454 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ferndale scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ferndale
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,441 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ferndale
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ferndale
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ferndale
3.9

How Ferndale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ferndale risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 1732004.0Ferndaleparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ferndale

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.2/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Disability prevalence runs 19.2% against 31.5% nationally.

Cost burden runs around a third here against 39.8% across Oakland County. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.2/10. It sits 0.8 points below the Oakland County average of 4.0.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,441, 10% above the Ferndale average.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Detroit. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #63,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $120,144, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125173200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125173200?

Census tract 26125173200 in Ferndale scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125173200?

Median gross rent is $1,441/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125173200?

5.0% of residents in tract 26125173200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,864.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125173200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 4th, minority 26th, housing 7th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26125173200 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26125173200 compare to Ferndale overall?

Tract 26125173200 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Ferndale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ferndale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26125173200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ferndale

Top eight tracts in Ferndale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related