Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Hazel Park Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26125175100 · Oakland County, MI · pop 4,454

Census tract 26125175100 runs through Hazel Park in Oakland County. With 4,454 residents, it scores 6.1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 42% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,172 a month while the average household earns $63,271 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 30% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units2,198
Renter share52.1%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$63,271

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Hazel Park
Low
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#47 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
High
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#1,354 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hazel Park and the region

Centroid at 42.4652, -83.0978 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hazel Park scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hazel Park
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,172 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hazel Park
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hazel Park
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hazel Park
5.8

How Hazel Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hazel Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 175100Hazel Park: 3.13.1Hazel Parkparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 67

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hazel Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hazel Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Oakland County average of 5.7 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 67th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26125175100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125175100?

Census tract 26125175100 in Hazel Park scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26125175100?

Median gross rent is $1,172/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26125175100?

10.5% of residents in tract 26125175100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,454.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26125175100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 36th, minority 28th, housing 73th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26125175100 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26125175100 compare to Hazel Park overall?

Tract 26125175100 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Hazel Park at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hazel Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 26125175100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 96% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hazel Park

Top eight tracts in Hazel Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related