Skip to content
Hazel Park, Michigan eviction risk overview
City brief · 14,963 residents

Hazel Park, MI Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Oakland County · Population 14,963

In 2026
Risk score
6.5
ELEVATED

94th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average3.6 Now6.5
10 5 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.3 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.4 2002 · score 3.5 2003 · score 3.5 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.4 2017 · score 4.6 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 5.0 2020 · score 5.5 2021 · score 5.5 2022 · score 5.5 2023 · score 5.5 2024 · score 5.3 2025 · score 6.5 2026 · score 6.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.2 Regional 7.2 State 3.3 Economic 6.3 Supply 7.7 Rent Control 5.1 Eviction 2.9 Tenant 7.9 Housing 5.8 6.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.6% (2024)
    7.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.2
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    3.3
  4. Economic stress
    13.6% poverty · 4.4% unemp.
    6.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,314 average · 33.9% renters
    7.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.0% of income on rent
    5.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    60 days filing → judgment
    2.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.9% renters
    7.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hazel Park and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Hazel Park compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Oakland County
High
#5 of 39 cities
Rank in county — 90th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 39 cities in Oakland County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
Very High
#66 of 743 cities
Rank in state — 91th percentileBottomTop
#66 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Hazel Park risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Hazel Park: 6.56.5Hazel ParkThis cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg in countyState: 5.85.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 60d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,314/mo. A contested eviction takes 60 days and costs $2,840–$6,013 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 14,963 residents, 33.9% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.2 and 7.2 (Dem margin +10.6% (2024)). State climate at 3.3 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.9, housing court bias 5.8, rent-control risk 5.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.3. Supply constraint: 7.7. The numbers behind those: 13.6% poverty, 4.4% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Hazel Park sits in the slow but cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 5.6 Detroit Warren, MI · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.9 Warren Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 3.6 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 5.2 Ann Arbor Dearborn, MI · 56d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Dearborn Livonia, MI · 62d · ~$5.0k all-in ($80/day) · score 6.0 Livonia Troy, MI · 59d · ~$4.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 5.7 Troy Westland, MI · 57d · ~$4.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Westland Farmington Hills, MI · 54d · ~$5.1k all-in ($94/day) · score 6.1 Farmington Hills Flint, MI · 59d · ~$4.8k all-in ($81/day) · score 5.0 Flint Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Hazel Park
Hazel Park · 60d · ~$4.4k all-in ($74/day) · score 6.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Hazel Park, MI

Landlording in Hazel Park, Michigan, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Hazel Park is a city of 14,963 residents where 33.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,314/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Hazel Park eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.9/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Hazel Park closes 60 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Hazel Park's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Hazel Park runs $2,840 to $6,013 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 60 days of typical timeline and $1,314/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.9/10 in Hazel Park, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Hazel Park: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $6,013 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Hazel Park

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 60 days and roughly $6,013 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $2,405 to $3,607 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under MCL 600.5701.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What are the common mistakes landlords make during a Hazel Park eviction?

The most common mistakes are accepting partial rent payments after issuing a notice (which often voids the notice), failing to serve notices correctly, and not documenting everything. Also, trying to "self-help" evict by changing locks or turning off utilities is illegal and will get your case thrown out, potentially costing you more.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for reasons other than non-payment in Hazel Park?

Yes, Michigan does not have a statewide "just-cause" eviction requirement. For month-to-month leases, you can typically terminate with a 30-day notice without providing a specific reason, as long as it's not discriminatory or retaliatory. For fixed-term leases, you generally need a lease violation.
Q3

How do tenant protections in Michigan impact landlords in Hazel Park?

Michigan has various tenant protections, including rules around security deposits, fair housing, and prohibitions against landlord retaliation. While there's no statewide rent control (see Michigan rent control rules) or source-of-income protection, local advocacy can sometimes influence court outcomes. Landlords must be aware of these to avoid legal pitfalls. Our Michigan tenant protections guide has more.
Q4

Should I always use an attorney for an eviction in Hazel Park?

For an everyday landlord, especially with Hazel Park's 6.5/10 eviction risk, hiring an attorney is highly recommended. The process is complex, and a single procedural error can lead to significant delays and added costs. An attorney ensures proper notice, court filings, and representation, greatly increasing your chances of a successful and timely eviction.
Q5

What if my tenant claims they can't pay due to financial hardship?

While you can sympathize, you are running a business. Michigan law doesn't generally require you to make concessions due to a tenant's financial hardship. You can choose to offer a payment plan or "cash for keys," but you are not legally obligated to. If you choose to proceed with eviction, follow the legal process strictly.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.5/10 places Hazel Park in the 94th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.