Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
Crystal Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27053021001 ·
Hennepin County, MN · pop 6,175
With a score of 5.6/10, tract 27053021001 in Crystal ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 6,175 residents. It lands near the 61st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,382 a month against an average household income of $82,409 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%Stable renters 17%Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units2,522
Renter share30.3%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$82,409
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
17th percentile
#6 of 7 tracts In Crystal
Very Low
Within county
35th percentile
#216 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Low
Within state
35th percentile
#979 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
National
21th percentile
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Crystal and the region
Centroid at 45.0164, -93.3645 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crystal scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,382 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6
How Crystal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
13%Socioeconomic
6%Household composition
52%Racial/ethnic minority
75%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
231Total filings over 5 yrs
5.42%Avg annual filing rate
8.1%Peak (2009)
46Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year2009 to 2013
Filings dropped 27% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
167Total filings 2020-21
2.2Avg monthly (observed)
2.2Pre-pandemic baseline
0.97×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.5%Housing insecurity
6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
12.8%Food insecurity
8.5%SNAP enrollment
7.8%Transit barriers
8.5%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
26.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crystal
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Crystal eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 25th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 231 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 5.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.1% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053021001
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053021001?
Census tract 27053021001 in Crystal scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053021001?
Median gross rent is $1,382/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053021001?
4.4% of residents in tract 27053021001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,175.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053021001?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 6th, minority 52th, housing 75th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053021001?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 231 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053021001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.42% of renter households, peaking at 8.1% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 27053021001 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.97× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27053021001 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27053021001 compare to Crystal overall?
Tract 27053021001 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Crystal at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Crystal
Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.