Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Crystal Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27053020700 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 4,261
Here is how census tract 27053020700, in Crystal eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.8/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 4,261. That is riskier than about 68% of US census tracts.
About 64% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,369 a month against an average household income of $90,185 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,706
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$90,185
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
37
th percentile
Low
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
National
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Crystal and the region
Centroid at 45.0610, -93.3513 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crystal scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,369 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6
How Crystal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 37
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 22%Socioeconomic
- 37%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 110Total filings over 5 yrs
- 9.72%Avg annual filing rate
- 16.3%Peak (2009)
- 21Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 44Total filings 2020-21
- 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.47×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.9%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.0%Food insecurity
- 7.9%SNAP enrollment
- 7.3%Transit barriers
- 7.9%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crystal
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Crystal eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 110 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 9.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.3% of renter households in 2009.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 37th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053020700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053020700?
Census tract 27053020700 in Crystal scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053020700?
Median gross rent is $1,369/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053020700?
8.6% of residents in tract 27053020700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,261.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053020700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 37th, minority 49th, housing 61th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053020700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 110 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053020700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.72% of renter households, peaking at 16.3% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 27053020700 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27053020700 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27053020700 compare to Crystal overall?
Tract 27053020700 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Crystal at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Crystal
Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related