Census Tract · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally
Crystal Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27053020804 ·
Hennepin County, MN · pop 2,994 · 95% of tract blocks fall in Crystal
Census tract 27053020804 sits in Crystal eviction risk, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. It lands near the 75th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 72% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,609 a month against an average household income of $76,325 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%Stable renters 10%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,232
Renter share35.1%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate11.4%
Median income$76,325
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 7 tracts In Crystal
Very High
Within county
46th percentile
#179 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
46th percentile
#811 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
National
33th percentile
#56,660 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Crystal and the region
Centroid at 45.0478, -93.3653 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crystal scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
11.4% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,609 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal
6.6
How Crystal compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 61
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
65%Socioeconomic
36%Household composition
51%Racial/ethnic minority
65%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
148Total filings over 5 yrs
6.53%Avg annual filing rate
11.7%Peak (2009)
30Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year2009 to 2013
Filings dropped 29% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
79Total filings 2020-21
1.0Avg monthly (observed)
2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.52×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
14.6%Housing insecurity
8.8%Utility-shutoff threat
17.2%Food insecurity
13.0%SNAP enrollment
10.2%Transit barriers
10.6%No health insurance
17.2%Frequent mental distress
30.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crystal
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Crystal eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.52x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 148 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 6.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.7% of renter households in 2009.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053020804
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053020804?
Census tract 27053020804 in Crystal scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053020804?
Median gross rent is $1,609/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053020804?
11.4% of residents in tract 27053020804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,994.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053020804?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 36th, minority 51th, housing 65th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053020804?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 148 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053020804 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.53% of renter households, peaking at 11.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 27053020804 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.52× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27053020804 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27053020804 compare to Crystal overall?
Tract 27053020804 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Crystal at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Crystal
Top eight tracts in Crystal ranked by composite eviction-risk score.