Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,005 of 84,120 nationally

Cedar-Riverside Eviction Risk: High , Minneapolis

Tract 27053104801 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 5,190 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Cedar-Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis anchors census tract 27053104801, which lands at 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 96th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

61% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $754 a month against an average household income of $21,589 a year, roughly 42% of income at the averages. Renters make up 100% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 61% Stable renters 39% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units2,182
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate60.0%
Median income$21,589

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Cedar-Riverside
Very High
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 44.9689, -93.2502 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedar-Riverside scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
60.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$754 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How Cedar-Riverside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedar-Riverside risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 104801Minneapolis: 6.46.4Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 198Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.45×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.85× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (2.27× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (2.10× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (3.62× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2023-05-01: 11 filings (3.82× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (10.23× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (7.95× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (2.83× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (4.94× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (3.41× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.89× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cedar-Riverside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedar-Riverside

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 45.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 36.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 98% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053104801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053104801?

Census tract 27053104801 in the Cedar-Riverside neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053104801?

Median gross rent is $754/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053104801?

60.0% of residents in tract 27053104801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,190.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053104801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 100th, minority 98th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 27053104801 considered part of Cedar-Riverside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053104801 fall within Cedar-Riverside (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053104801 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.45× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053104801 struggle to pay rent?

About 45.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 36.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053104801 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053104801 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 27053104801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 98% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related