Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,438 of 84,120 nationally

Prospect Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Minneapolis

Tract 27053104902 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 4,714 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 27053104902 sits in Prospect Park in Minneapolis eviction risk, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 7.2/10. It lands near the 97th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

63% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,288 monthly, set against $33,775 in average yearly household income, roughly 46% of income at the averages. Renters make up 93% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 58% Stable renters 35% Owners 7%
Tract context
Occupied units1,975
Renter share92.6%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate49.7%
Median income$33,775

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Prospect Park
Very High
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 44.9694, -93.2218 · click any tract to drill in

Why Prospect Park scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
49.7% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,288 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How Prospect Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Prospect Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.87.8This tracttract 104902Minneapolis: 6.46.4Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 228Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.48×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.96× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (4.44× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (1.53× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (2.29× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (4.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 10 filings (4.44× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (1.92× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (3.82× baseline)2025-07-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-11-01: 12 filings (4.58× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (2.57× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Prospect Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Prospect Park

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Part of this tract, about 12% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053104902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053104902?

Census tract 27053104902 in the Prospect Park neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053104902?

Median gross rent is $1,288/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053104902?

49.7% of residents in tract 27053104902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,714.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053104902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 6th, minority 69th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 27053104902 considered part of Prospect Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053104902 fall within Prospect Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053104902 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.48× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053104902 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053104902 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053104902 scores 7.8/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 27053104902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related